Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region

Authors

  • Aurysia Hii National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia
  • Abrar Ahmad Chughtai School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Tambri Housen National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia
  • Salanieta Saketa Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, Pacific Community, New Caledonia
  • Mohana Priya Kunasekaran School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Feroza Sulaiman School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • NK Semara Yanti School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Chandini Raina MacIntyre School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia; College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University, AZ, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2018.9.2.009

Abstract

Objective: To understand the global outbreak surveillance needs of stakeholders involved in epidemic response in selected countries and areas in the Asia–Pacific region to inform development of an epidemic observatory, Epi-watch.

Methods: We designed an online, semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire to collect information on global outbreak surveillance sources and limitations from participants who use epidemic intelligence and outbreak alert services in their work in government and nongovernment organizations in the Asia–Pacific region.

Results: All respondents agreed that it was important to remain up to date with global outbreaks. The main reason cited for following global outbreak news was as an early warning for serious epidemics. Mainstream media and specialist Internet sources such as the World Health Organization (n = 54/91; 59%), the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases (ProMED)-mail (n = 45/91; 49%) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 31/91; 34%) were the most common sources for global outbreak news; rapid intelligence services such as HealthMap were less common (n = 9/91; 10%). Only 51% (n = 46/91) of respondents thought that their sources of outbreak news were timely and sufficient for their needs.

Conclusion: For those who work in epidemic response, epidemic intelligence is important and widely used. Stakeholders are less aware of and less frequently use rapid sources such as HealthMap and rely more on validated but less timely traditional sources of disease surveillance. Users identified a need for more timely and reliable epidemic intelligence.

Author Biography

Aurysia Hii, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia

Master of Philosophy in Applied Epidemiology (MAE) Scholar

Australian National University and NHMRC CRE Integrated Systems for Epidemic Response

References

Li A, Kasai T. The Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases – a strategy for regional health security. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal : WPSAR. 2011;2(1):6-9.

World Health Organization South-East Asia Region and Western Pacific Region. Health in Asia and the Pacific. Manila; 2008. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/health_research/documents/Health_in_Asia_and_the_Pacific/en/ [accessed 22 February 2018].

Heymann DL, Rodier G. Global Surveillance, National Surveillance, and SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(2):173-5.

World Health Organization. Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases and Public Health Emergencies. Manila: Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2016. Contract No.: WPR/RC67/9. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/about/regional_committee/67/documents/wpr_rc67_9_apsed.pdf [accessed 22 February 2018].

Lederberg J, Davis JR. Emerging infectious diseases from the global to the local perspective: workshop summary: National Academies Press; 2001.

World Health Organization - South East Asia Region and Western Pacific Region. Securing our Region’s Health: The Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases. Manila; 2010. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/emerging_diseases/documents/SecuringsRegHealth15/en/ [accessed 22 February 2018].

Coker RJ, Hunter BM, Rudge JW, Liverani M, Hanvoravongchai P. Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: regional challenges to control. The Lancet. 2011;377(9765):599-609.

Morand S, Jittapalapong S, Suputtamongkol Y, Abdullah MT, Huan TB. Infectious diseases and their outbreaks in Asia-Pacific: biodiversity and its regulation loss matter. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90032.

Castillo-Salgado C. Trends and directions of global public health surveillance. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2010;32(1):93-109.

Hitchcock P, Chamberlain A, Van Wagoner M, Inglesby TV, O'Toole T. Challenges to global surveillance and response to infectious disease outbreaks of international importance. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism. 2007;5(3):206-27.

Craig AT, Kama M, Samo M, Vaai S, Matanaicake J, Joshua C, et al. Early warning epidemic surveillance in the Pacific island nations: an evaluation of the Pacific syndromic surveillance system. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2016;21(7):917-27.

Commonwealth of Australia. Health for Development Strategy 2015-2020. Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade; 2015. Available from: https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/health-for-development-strategy-2015-2020.PDF [accessed 23 February 2018].

World Health Organization. International Health Regulations (2005). Manila; 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/ihr/en/ [accessed 15 January 2018].

Hardiman M. The revised International Health Regulations: A framework for global health security. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2003;21(2):207-11.

World Health Organization. A guide to establishing event-based surveillance. Manila; 2008. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/emerging_diseases/documents/eventbasedsurv/en/ [accessed Accessed 28 January 2018].

World Health Organization. Early detection, assessment and response to acute public health events Implementation of Early Warning and Response with a focus on Event-Based Surveillance. World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/ihr/publications/WHO_HSE_GCR_LYO_2014.4/en/ [accessed 22 February 2018].

Barboza P, Vaillant L, Mawudeku A, Nelson NP, Hartley DM, Madoff LC, et al. Evaluation of Epidemic Intelligence Systems Integrated in the Early Alerting and Reporting Project for the Detection of A/H5N1 Influenza Events. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3).

Gajewski KN, Peterson AE, Chitale RA, Pavlin JA, Russell KL, Chretien J-P. A Review of Evaluations of Electronic Event-Based Biosurveillance Systems. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e111222.

Yan SJ, Chughtai AA, Macintyre CR. Utility and potential of rapid epidemic intelligence from internet-based sources. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;63:77-87.

Mikaela K, Michael B, Herman T, Clark CF, Kenneth DM, Abla M, et al. Use of Unstructured Event-Based Reports for Global Infectious Disease Surveillance. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2009;15(5):689.

Chunara R, Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS. New technologies for reporting real-time emergent infections. Parasitology. 2012;139(14):1843-51.

Guo P, Wang L, Zhang Y, Luo G, Zhang Y, Deng C, et al. Can internet search queries be used for dengue fever surveillance in China? International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2017;63:74-6.

Wilson K, Brownstein JS. Early detection of disease outbreaks using the Internet. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2009;180(8):829-31.

Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: A systematic review. Milbank Quarterly. 2014;92(1):7-33.

Houston JB, Hawthorne J, Perreault MF, Park EH, Goldstein Hode M, Halliwell MR, et al. Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters. 2015;39(1):1-22.

Heymann DL, Rodier GR. Hot spots in a wired world: WHO surveillance of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Elsevier; 2001. p. 345-53.

O'Shea J. Digital disease detection: A systematic review of event-based internet biosurveillance systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2017;101:15-22.

Chan EH, Brewer TF, Madoff LC, Pollack MP, Sonricker AL, Keller M, et al. Global capacity for emerging infectious disease detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(50):21701-6.

Mondor L, Brownstein JS, Chan E, Madoff LC, Pollack MP, Buckeridge DL, et al. Timeliness of Nongovernmental versus Governmental Global Outbreak Communications. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2012;18(7):1184-7.

Ramalingam B. Real-time Monitoring in Disease Outbreaks: Strengths, Weaknesses and Future Potential. IDS; 2016.

Carrion M, Madoff LC. ProMED-mail: 22 years of digital surveillance of emerging infectious diseases. International Health. 2017;9(3):177-83.

Groseclose SL, Buckeridge DL. Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recent Advances in Their Use and Evaluation. Annual Review of Public Health. 2017;38(1):57-79.

Published

18-12-2018

How to Cite

1.
Hii A, Chughtai AA, Housen T, Saketa S, Kunasekaran MP, Sulaiman F, Yanti NS, MacIntyre CR. Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia–Pacific region. Western Pac Surveill Response J [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 18 [cited 2024 Jul. 16];9(4). Available from: https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/637

Issue

Section

Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)