Enhanced syndromic surveillance for mass gatherings in the Pacific: a case study of the 11th Festival of Pacific Arts in Solomon Islands, 2012

Authors

  • Damian Hoy Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Salanieta Saketa Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Roy Roger Maraka National Referral Hospital, Solomon Islands
  • Alison Sio Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS), Solomon Islands
  • Ian Wanyeki Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Pascal Frison Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Divi Ogaoga National Referral Hospital, Solomon Islands
  • Dennie Iniakawala Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Cynthia Joshua Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS), Solomon Islands
  • Sala Duituturaga Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Christelle Lepers Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Adam Roth Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Paul White Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community
  • Yvan Souares Research, Evidence and Information Programme, Public Health Division, the Pacific Community; Agence Sanitaire et Sociale de la Nouvelle

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2016.7.1.004

Abstract

Mass gatherings pose public health challenges to host countries, as they can cause or exacerbate disease outbreaks within the host location or elsewhere. In July 2012, the 11th Festival of Pacific Arts (FOPA), a mass gathering event involving 22 Pacific island states and territories, was hosted by Solomon Islands. An enhanced syndromic surveillance (ESS) system was implemented for the event. Throughout the capital city, Honiara, 15 sentinel sites were established and successfully took part in the ESS system, which commenced one week before the FOPA (25 June) and concluded eight days after the event (22 July). The ESS involved expanding on the existing syndromic surveillance parameters: from one to 15 sentinel sites, from four to eight syndromes, from aggregated to case-based reporting and from weekly to daily reporting. A web-based system was developed to enable data entry, data storage and data analysis. Towards the end of the ESS period, a focus group discussion and series of key informant interviews were conducted. The ESS was considered a success and played an important role in the early detection of possible outbreaks. For the period of the ESS, 1668 patients with syndrome presentations were received across the 15 sentinel sites. There were no major events of public health significance. Several lessons were learnt that are relevant to ESS in mass gathering scenarios, including the importance of having adequate lead in time for engagement and preparation to ensure appropriate policy and institutional frameworks are put in place.

Downloads

Published

27-09-2016

How to Cite

1.
Hoy D, Saketa S, Maraka RR, Sio A, Wanyeki I, Frison P, Ogaoga D, Iniakawala D, Joshua C, Duituturaga S, Lepers C, Roth A, White P, Souares Y. Enhanced syndromic surveillance for mass gatherings in the Pacific: a case study of the 11th Festival of Pacific Arts in Solomon Islands, 2012. Western Pac Surveill Response J [Internet]. 2016 Sep. 27 [cited 2026 Apr. 10];7(3). Available from: https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/422

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2016): July – September

Section

Surveillance System Implementation / Evaluation

License

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

When the Licensor is an intergovernmental organization, disputes will be resolved by mediation and arbitration unless otherwise agreed.

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>