Incorporating One Health into a front-line field epidemiological training programme in Papua New Guinea: lessons learned

Authors

  • Kelitha Malio World Vision Papua New Guinea, Boroko, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea; Field Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Bethseba Peni Field Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea; West New Britain Provincial Health Authority, Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea
  • Elaine Hevoho National Agriculture Quarantine & Inspection Authority, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Abel Yamba Field Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Alois Pukienei Field Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea; Autonomous Region of Bougainville Provincial Health Authority, Buka, Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Papua New Guinea
  • Laura Macfarlane-Berry University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
  • Trinidad Velasco Ortuzar University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
  • Barry Ropa Field Epidemiology Training Program, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Ilagi Puana National Agriculture Quarantine & Inspection Authority, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
  • Therese Kearns University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-7572
  • Tambri Housen University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2024.15.4.1107

Keywords:

One Health, outbreaks, epidemiology, training of trainers, inservice training, public health surveillance, evidence-based practice

Abstract

Problem: Over the past two decades, there has been increased recognition of the importance of a more holistic approach to preventing, predicting, detecting and responding to public health threats. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to bring together environmental, human and animal health sectors in addressing public health threats and the need to develop skilled front-line workers to act as surge capacity during health emergencies.

Context: Papua New Guinea is a high-risk country for emerging and re-emerging pathogens. The effects of climate change, human-mediated encroachment on natural habitats and destructive land-use practices have threatened ecosystems and caused environmental damage. The movement of goods, animals and people over porous borders provides opportunities for the introduction and spread of new pathogens.

Action: In recognition of the importance of multisectoral responses to health threats in Papua New Guinea, and the need to train front-line workers, we designed and piloted a 3-month One Health in-service training programme for front-line workers from across all sectors.

Lessons learned: The co-creation of curricula was essential in ensuring the relevance of the programme to front-line workers from multiple sectors, and the development of provincial training teams was key to ensuring mentorship and programme sustainability. Bringing front-line workers together in joint trainings facilitated the building of relationships, the understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the various sectors, the identification of sectoral focal points and the development of informal networks.

Discussion: Papua New Guinea’s One Health front-line Field Epidemiology Training Program demonstrated that investment in cross-sectoral training programmes can be a catalyst for the implementation of One Health approaches on the front line.

Downloads

Published

12-11-2024

How to Cite

1.
Malio K, Peni B, Hevoho E, Yamba A, Pukienei A, Macfarlane-Berry L, Velasco Ortuzar T, Ropa B, Puana I, Kearns T, Housen T. Incorporating One Health into a front-line field epidemiological training programme in Papua New Guinea: lessons learned. Western Pac Surveill Response J [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 12 [cited 2026 Apr. 17];15(4). Available from: https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/1107

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024): October – December

Section

Lessons from the Field

Categories

License

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

When the Licensor is an intergovernmental organization, disputes will be resolved by mediation and arbitration unless otherwise agreed.

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Most read articles by the same author(s)