Management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus in a rural Australian residential aged-care facility, 2023

Authors

  • Hannah Woodall Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
  • Teresa McGorm Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
  • Rikki Graham Public Health Microbiology, Public and Environmental Health, Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Amy Jennison Public Health Microbiology, Public and Environmental Health, Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Priya Janagaraj Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1176

Keywords:

invasive group A Streptococcus, disease outbreak, aged care facility, public health management

Abstract

Objective: To outline the management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) in a residential aged-care facility in rural Queensland, Australia, comparing outbreak management with the newly released Australian Series of National Guidelines (SoNG) for this disease and exploring unique aspects of rural iGAS outbreak management.

Methods: An outbreak of iGAS was identified in a rural Queensland residential facility, where two cases occurred within 24 hours. A confirmed case was defined as any individual linked to the facility who had laboratory evidence of group A Streptococcus (GAS) in a sterile site. Whole genome sequencing was performed on all confirmed cases. The public health management of this outbreak was conducted according to the Queensland Communicable Disease Control guidelines and was compared with the new SoNG.

Results: A phylogenetic tree confirmed that the two samples clustered closely together with a single allele difference. Chemoprophylaxis was offered to all residents and staff in the affected part of the facility; 95% (42/44) of residents consented to chemoprophylaxis. Increased surveillance for GAS and increased facility cleaning were recommended by the public health unit. No additional cases were identified after 30 days of surveillance. Management of the outbreak largely aligned with the SoNG except for post-outbreak surveillance, which would have been extended under the new guidelines.

Discussion: This paper highlights factors unique to managing iGAS outbreaks in rural areas. Rural workforce factors and access to pathology services impact rural outbreak management, and thus involving local services and considering the local context are vital. The use of chemoprophylaxis continues to be recommended by the SoNG, and in this case was considered to be an important adjunct to other management strategies.

Downloads

Published

01-09-2025

How to Cite

1.
Woodall H, McGorm T, Graham R, Jennison A, Janagaraj P. Management of an outbreak of invasive group A Streptococcus in a rural Australian residential aged-care facility, 2023. Western Pac Surveill Response J [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 1 [cited 2026 Mar. 24];16(3). Available from: https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/1176

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): July – September

Section

Outbreak Investigation Report

License

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

When the Licensor is an intergovernmental organization, disputes will be resolved by mediation and arbitration unless otherwise agreed.

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.