Monitoring mortality in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic control in Victoria, Australia: a time series analysis of population data

Authors

  • Lalitha Sundaresan Mathematica, Oakland, California, United States of America
  • Sheena G Sullivan WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Public Health Division, Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • David J Muscatello School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Daneeta Hennessy Public Health Division, Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Stacey L Rowe School of Population Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.1.1091

Keywords:

surveillance, time series, COVID-19 pandemic, mitigation measures

Abstract

Objective: Mortality surveillance was established in the state of Victoria just before the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we describe the establishment of this surveillance system, justify the modelling approach selected, and provide examples of how the interpretation of changes in mortality rates during the pandemic was influenced by the model chosen.

Methods: Registered deaths occurring in Victoria from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020 were sourced from the Victoria Death Index. Observed mortality rates were compared to a raw historical 5-year mean and to predicted means estimated from a seasonal robust regression. Differences between the observed mortality rate and the historical mean (delta-MR) and excess mortality rate from the observed and predicted rates were assessed.

Results: There were 20 375 COVID-19 cases notified in Victoria as of 31 December 2020, of whom 748 (3.7%) died. Victorians aged >=85 years experienced the highest case fatality ratio (34%). Mean observed mortality rates in 2020 (MR: 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4, 11.9) were slightly reduced when compared with the annual rate expected using the historical mean method (mean MR: 12.2; 95% CI: 12.1, 12.3; delta-MR: -0.57; 95% CI: -0.77, -0.38), but not from the rate expected using the robust regression (estimated MR: 11.7; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 11.5, 11.9; EMR: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.16). The two methods yielded opposing interpretations for some causes, including cardiovascular and cancer mortality.

Discussion: Interpretation of how pandemic restrictions impacted mortality in Victoria in 2020 is influenced by the method of estimation. Time-series approaches are preferential because they account for population trends in mortality over time.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

16-01-2025

How to Cite

1.
Sundaresan L, Sullivan SG, Muscatello DJ, Hennessy D, Rowe SL. Monitoring mortality in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic control in Victoria, Australia: a time series analysis of population data. Western Pac Surveill Response J [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 16 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];16(1). Available from: https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ojs/index.php/wpsar/article/view/1091

Issue

Section

Original Research

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)